Have you ever been asked to review a video online? Well, if it’s your first time, it won’t be easy. Sometimes when asked to do a review they want your opinion, other times they want a full review but not an opinion, instead letting the reader of the review decide.
It’s not easy to write a video review online because you’re taking something that’s 3D and reducing it to words. Here is an online video review example (with opinion) that can help you understand how to write an online video review:
interview format
Ari and another gentleman were being interviewed by LawLine. The interviewer was interviewing both his son (David Shurman) and Ari. Ari is a former full time practicing attorney who always enjoyed the interesting information he learned and the interesting people he met because of his profession, but not so much the paperwork, there was always a lot to go through and he did. diligently. He remembers lamenting his days at work with his wife and telling her about the interesting people he met every night.
Theme
The main theme of the interviews was the increasing use of lawyers to use the Internet and informational marketing, or rather using the Internet as a way to boost “expert status” using technologies such as blogging, iPod Casting, SEO ( search engine optimization) and article writing. Both interviewees presented several relevant strategies in this place to help lawyers better market their services.
In fact, the interviewer (old school lawyer) was simply in awe of the potential and new technologies and how this changed the game. An interesting example was a Chicago law firm that was able to capitalize on “Keywords” like “I hurt my leg” to drive web surfers to their website and then convert them into clients.
The Interview showed the importance of having a Presence on the Internet and how this is the new paradigm and law firms must adapt to this new technologically changing environment. Other examples of future technologies were woven into the interview to show that the future is now, the train has left the station, and law firms must move on if they are to remain competitive.
Problems with that interview
Ari touched her face too much, especially her ears. His body language suggested to me that he was severely withholding his great energy and being too conciliatory with the other interviewee, who also happened to be the interviewer’s son. Ari seemed more qualified to talk about it, but he had to pretend that the interviewee’s son was his, just like him, it was nothing like that. The son responded with various statements that gave Ari credibility, and yet Ari, though he played well, gave himself away because he knew he was beyond the son’s knowledge base.
What I conclude:
It is problematic that lawyers have dominated every sector of the economy, bureaucracy, military, business, and everyday life in America, now they are training other lawyers on how to take over the Internet. This is typical of the selfish profession of law and how it provides little to no productivity and costs our economy trillions of dollars each year in exorbitant costs.
Interestingly, as lawyers start to blog, they will stay above the populace on their content and sue anyone who disagrees with them. Thus it will ruin another industry or sector. In this case, the greatest communication system ever created in human history will be destroyed by lawyers, who have hijacked the Information Highway of the future. Now, the interview was valid in the sense that these strategies can work for any type of company, consultant, and therefore the panel discussion/cut-off interview was worth watching.
Ari Kaplan has the proper patrician look and would be much better in a single interview or with someone who is his equal, if someone can be found to promote various topics as an expert. He needs someone to interview him who is wise and can keep up. He’s slowing down his flow of information and his ability to speak at 165 words per minute. He needs more time to speak and someone who can guide the flow of his knowledge base in an interview. People could learn a lot from Ari. The question is just, is the world ready to discuss things at the highest level?